|
#91036769
1967-69 Camaro, 1968-74 Nova Tubular Upper and Lower Control Arms
- Heavy duty tubular design and black powder coated finish is the perfect addition to any resto-mod build
- Lower control arm has a deeper spring pocket which lowers the ride height 1-1/2" to 2" compared to stock
- Upper control arms have improved geometry and are designed for 4 degrees of caster to firmly plant modern radial tires
$446.99
/set
In Stock
Quantity
Need Help? Call to Order
Add to a list
Select a vehicle to verify Fitment
Select Vehicle
Product Summary
Steel, Tubular Control Arm Style, Ball Joint Included
- Heavy duty tubular design and black powder coated finish is the perfect addition to any resto-mod build
- Lower control arm has a deeper spring pocket which lowers the ride height 1-1/2" to 2" compared to stock
- Upper control arms have improved geometry and are designed for 4 degrees of caster to firmly plant modern radial tires
- New greaseable ball joints come pre-installed and are OEM replacement designs making service parts readily available
- Greaseable Delrin bushings virtually eliminate flex and reduce friction to improve handling while remaining squeak free
Comes as a Kit
View Kit Components
Key Specs
| Control Arm Style | Tubular |
| Position | Front Upper and Lower |
| Ball Joint Type | Press-in/Bolt-in |
| Bushing Material | Delrin |
| Control Arm Material | Steel |
Need To Know
Need help?
855.313.9176Quick and Easy Returns
Return PolicySpeedway Motors 91036769 Details
Speedway Motors 91036769 Details
- Strong tubular construction with durable gloss black powder coat protection
- Control arms feature greasable Delrin bushings and OEM-style ball joints preinstalled
- Revised spring pocket provides 1-1/2 to 2-inch drop in ride height with stock spring
- Control arms can be used with stock springs or with coilover kits
- Polyurethane bump stops are included for both upper and lower control arms
- Utilizes OEM sway bar end links and ball joints for easy servicing
- Upper control arms feature 4-degrees of positive caster via caster key inserts
- Also fits 1967-1969 Pontiac Firebird models
- Lower control arm design requires disc brakes; drum backing plate interferes
Improve Your Camaro or Nova’s Handling and Looks with a Bolt-On Control Arm Upgrade
Your first gen Camaro/Firebird and third/fourth gen Nova utilize the same bolt-in front subframe assembly. This production piece uses traditional stamped steel upper and lower control arms fitted with a coil spring and a shock absorber for dampening. These pieces provided a fairly decent ride 50 plus years ago on bias-ply tires. However, today’s world is vastly different. We want our muscle cars to handle, fit big disc brakes, and wide sticky rubber. These stock stamped steel control arms can literally flex and fail under the cornering and braking forces applied to them, especially in a track environment. The last thing any enthusiast wants is a part failure that could potentially cause damage to their pride and joy (or worse, cause injuries). Updating your GM pony car with Speedway Motors’ beefy Camaro tubular control arms strengthens and enhances your muscle car’s ride while providing 1-1/2-inch to 2-inch drop in front ride height.
Stamped Versus Tubular, The Benefits of Our Control Arms Are Obvious
As we stated earlier, a stamped steel control arm invites lots of sloppiness into your suspension due to flexing and twisting. While a stamping is indeed stronger than a flat sheet of metal, tubing is stronger still. So, when creating control arms from steel tubing you greatly increase the rigidity of the product, eliminating that slop from twisting and flexing. What does that mean for you behind the wheel? When it comes to tubular control arms vs stock you dive into a corner on our tubular control arms your vehicle will go where you point it to. Getting down on that brake pedal for some extreme braking? Even your brakes will perform better since your control arms aren’t flexing under that hard braking input.
These are the best tubular control arms Camaro and Nova owners will find and feature a robust 1-5/8-inch diameter tubing for the lower arms and 1-1/8-inch tubing for the uppers, both finished in a show-quality gloss black powder coat. Wall thickness of our tubular steel control arms is .156-inch on the lowers and .125-inch on the uppers. Due to the thickness and material diameters these control arms do weigh more than the stock stamped control arms, but the small trade off in unsprung weight for the vast increase in strength makes it worth the small weight penalty.
We have fitted greasable Delrin bushings and OE-spec ball joints to our tubular A arms with easy access grease fittings to make maintenance a breeze. Polyurethane bump stops are included for both upper and lower arm assemblies and these control arms are compatible with stock-style shock absorbers or can be used with aftermarket coilover shocks. Fitting coilover shocks requires removal of the OE-style shock mounting nuts that are welded to the lower control arm spring pocket. We also recommend our coilover reinforcement plate to ensure the coilover shock is properly supported in the Speedway Camaro control arms.
A Direct Bolt-In Solution That Is Easy to Install
Our tubular lower control arm bolts into place using your original control arm’s mounting hardware. If your fasteners have seen better days or went missing don’t worry, we offer a lower control arm bolt kit and lower control arm lock nut kit to keep your project from grinding to a halt. We designed these lower arms to accept your stock sway bar end links, so there is no need to replace your sway bar or end links just to fit these control arms.
Due to the design of our tubular lower control arms, we highly recommend upgrading to disc brakes, as the drum brake backing plate interferes with the lower control arm and will require major surgery to retain your factory drum brakes up front. Lastly, we revised the spring pocket location to allow a lowered ride height of approximately 1-1/2 to 2-inches without introducing ride harshness of a lowering spring.
The tubular upper arm in our kit features 4 degrees of positive caster with the included caster keys installed with the mounting holes towards the rear of the car. Additional caster can be dialed in by flipping the caster keys so that the mounting holes are towards the front of the car. A direct bolt-in solution, we offer a replacement upper control arm mounting bolt and nut kit if your original fasteners should be damaged or have become lost. We also offer a nice alignment shim kit for your upper control arms if your old shims are damaged or you need additional shims to set your alignment to your preferred specifications.
What more could you ask for from a set of bolt-on Speedway tubular control arms like these? Your muscle car gains increased handling, lower ride height, performance bushings with minimal deflection, and more, all without the cost of upgrading to an aftermarket subframe and the major work that entails.
Instruction info https://mbmbrakes.com/content/UCALCA6769.pdf
Speedway Motors 91036769 Specifications
Speedway Motors 91036769 Specifications
| KEY SPECS | |
|---|---|
| MFG. Part # | 91036769 |
| Brand | Speedway Motors |
| Control Arm Style | Tubular |
| Position | Front Upper and Lower |
| Ball Joint Type | Press-in/Bolt-in |
| Bushing Material | Delrin |
| Control Arm Material | Steel |
| Hardware Included | No |
| Adjustable | No |
| Finish | Powder Coated |
| GENERAL | |
| Material Type | Steel |
| Ball Joint Included | Yes |
| Color | Black |
| Sold in Quantity | Kit |
| Bushing Included | Yes |
Ratings & Reviews
4.4
53 Reviews
The product received mixed reviews. Users appreciated the high quality, reasonable price, easing fitting, and good aesthetics of the control arms. It added favorable changes to the vehicles like improved handling, tight suspension, and increased caster. Some customers lauded the grease fittings for the bushings and reversible inserts for easier caster adjustments. However, there were some concerns about the bushings, durability and fitment issues. Compared to pricier brands, customers deemed the product a good value despite certain quality differences. It's evidently well-regarded for road vehicles, despite a few commenting on fitment.
Ratings & Reviews
4.4
53 Reviews
The product received mixed reviews. Users appreciated the high quality, reasonable price, easing fitting, and good aesthetics of the control arms. It added favorable changes to the vehicles like improved handling, tight suspension, and increased caster. Some customers lauded the grease fittings for the bushings and reversible inserts for easier caster adjustments. However, there were some concerns about the bushings, durability and fitment issues. Compared to pricier brands, customers deemed the product a good value despite certain quality differences. It's evidently well-regarded for road vehicles, despite a few commenting on fitment.
4.4
53 reviews
5
34
4
14
3
1
2
1
1
3
Most Liked Positive Review
5.0
Buick Apollo (the last one)
I spent many hours researching tubular control arms available from multiple manufacturers what you will receive when purchasing theseis a beautiful powder coated super heavy duty set of control arms they have been perfectly designedare far exceeding the quality of your stock components all parts fit correctly no modifications are needed they are tight fitting parts I would strongly recommend having a nice sized rubber mallet to help get them exactly where they need to be without scratching or denting there beautiful finish a guide pin or if you have limited tools a medium size screwdriver Phillips head will greatly help you line up the control arm with the holes in the car's body took just under six hours to remove my originals and reinstall the new I would strongly recommend this product I almost bought from another company total price would have been over $1,300 for the upper and lower and I can see no advantage that they offered over these literally made out of the same material can kind of welds I absolutely will be buying more of these in the future for my other vehicles not often spend hard earn money on these cars and receiver product that I actually would have paid considerably more for and been happy with them still I have been playing with these cars my entire life 40 years experience these are one of the absolute best Bangs for your Buck I read a few other reviews most were good one or two complaining about issues they had installing them sorry for those guys but it's not the quality of these parts remember the rubber mallet will be your friend during installation also grab a couple of guys wrote that these are 2 inch drop they certainly are not the amount and install a stock if there were a two inch drop the spindles would need to be replaced that is not the case I hope someone finds me review helpful I also took that every detailed photos of the entire process which I was going to add unfortunately Speedway site not allowing me to download the photos John Urbancik owner suicidal solutions Automotive
Most Liked Negative Review
1.0
would not BUY again, stick with OEM
upper arms come with locking nuts. one of the nuts came off. bought new locking nuts (thinner) and lock washers. I installed these as tight as possible, then it started squeaking (to tight?) I will remove and see if grease is there or lacking. I removed bottom a arm at ball joint and the rubber cover is all cracked (not even 3 months old). kit dropped car 2 inches so I have to install new hd springs. these are junk and I will return to original type A Arms. junk customer service does not answer no more business with you
Filter by Ratings
Great upgrade
5.0
a year ago
Kevin17m
Pa
Verified
Great upgrade over my rusted out originals they fit perfectly and look awesome cant wait to try them out
Would Recommend
Fit and worked good
4.0
a year ago
À
Ar
Verified
Customer car street driven
Would Recommend
I would buy them again but with a better plan.
4.0
2 years ago
Tony
Woodland ca
Verified
My 55 GMC truck is clipped so i picked these up thinking i could avoid dropped spindles. I was wrong. The weight of the truck is more than the car so it sits lower, that said with the deep buckets i only get slightly over 1/2" up travel between the bump stop and frame. EVERY bump i hit bottoms them out. I bought brand new stock big block springs too. Not sure what my direction is now but at the least I am looking at dropped spindles and stock lowers.
Great quality and great price
5.0
2 years ago
69cam
Anderson SC
I installed this control arm set on a 69 Camaro. With my original arms my steering was not great and after having the alignment tweaked several times and still no improvement I decided to try these arms. The install went well and the arms fit great. A little tapping with a rubber mallet and the lowers went right in. The ball joints seem to be good quality. Two tips that will hopefully help someone is pay attention to the upper cross shaft when installing. The cross shaft is offset on one side to allow the pucks to sit flat. This flat side goes against the frame when installed. I didn't notice it until after I installed and had to flip one side. This was not in the instructions. Second is I had to change the left lower grease fitting from a 45 to a 90 to be able to access the grease fitting. I did use some 3/8in rubber coil spring spacers so it would lower my car too much. With the spacers it lowered my car about 1/2in. I had it aligned and I could tell a huge difference. The car handles very well and the steering is nice and tight! Great arms for the price!
Would Recommend
would not BUY again, stick with OEM
1.0
5 years ago
rico
california
upper arms come with locking nuts. one of the nuts came off. bought new locking nuts (thinner) and lock washers. I installed these as tight as possible, then it started squeaking (to tight?) I will remove and see if grease is there or lacking. I removed bottom a arm at ball joint and the rubber cover is all cracked (not even 3 months old). kit dropped car 2 inches so I have to install new hd springs. these are junk and I will return to original type A Arms. junk customer service does not answer no more business with you
Would Not Recommend
I would definitely buy this set of control arms again.
5.0
5 years ago
Mike89co
Arvada, Co
Verified
These arms are high quality at a reasonable price.
Would Recommend
Not sure it lowered my Ventura much but great quality A arms
5.0
5 years ago
Colgad
Tampa Bay Area
Still too high even with ridetech lowing springs, thinking I need 2" drop spindles. I did an all aluminum LS swap and maybe that's why it's still high. It rides so that the wheel well is still 1"+ above the tire.
Would Recommend
Good quality and fast delivery
5.0
5 years ago
Kooki
Portland, OR
Verified
Happy with the purchase. Would've liked some additional hardware with it in a kit but it wasn't advertised that way either. Got what I asked for and it showed up on time.
The fit on this was not very good.
2.0
5 years ago
Chuck P.
Cincinnati Oh.
Verified
The fit is not very good. Piece was damaged. Have been waiting 3 weeks for resolution. Still no end in site.
Would Not Recommend
Great set
5.0
5 years ago
Ishi
Lad Vegas nv
Verified
This is my second set. 1st is on my 67 9 second drag car. Than this on my 68 camaro show car. Cannot tell difference from my fist global West set that costs way over 2xs on my 1969 camaro.
Would Recommend
Showing 10 of 53 reviews
Questions & Answers
63 Questions • 10 Answers
Questions & Answers
63 Questions • 10 Answers
What is the thread size of the welded in nuts on the lower arm for the shocks? I lost the OG hardware and my new shocks came with bolts that don't thread.
by Fred Dedrick
• 2 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
What lowering coil springs would recommend with these control arms?
by Geo
• 6 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Just to clarify, this is for 2 upper and 2 lower control arms, correct!
by James
• 7 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Will these control arms connect to my front sway bar? I have a 1969 Camaro.
by Angelo
• 7 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Do these upper arms improve the camber and caster numbers and if they do to what amount. Are there offset options? Is there any alignment numbers for the shop that does the alignment? Al
by Al
• 7 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
are the bolts kits 926-12708 and 926-10868 required or can the factory bolts be used instead
by David
• 7 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
What ball joint would fit it if I wanted to switch them out
by Joe
• 7 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Which way do the cams on the upper arms need to be installed for correct installation on a 1968 Camaro? They can be installed 2 ways. One way shifts the arm towards the front of the vehicle and the other shifts the arms more towards the firewall.
by Jason
• 7 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
can I use this control arms with coilover shocks ?
by tom
• 7 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Do you offer control arm kits that does not lower the cars ride height? 1969 Camaro with big block It already sits low in the front. Stock front suspension.
by Dennis
• 7 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
10 of 63 questions shown
Fitment
Fitment
1973-1974 Buick Apollo
1967-1969 Chevy Camaro
1968 Chevy Chevy II
1969-1974 Chevy Nova
1973-1974 Oldsmobile Omega
1968-1971 Pontiac Acadian
1967-1969 Pontiac Firebird
1971-1974 Pontiac Ventura

