|
#91034393
IMCA Spec GM Metric Stock Car Racing Upper Control Arms, Alum. Cross
- Tubular steel construction with aluminum cross shaft for maximum weight reduction
- 1" OD .092" wall thickness tubing reduces weight while maintaining durability
- Bolts to stock 1978-87 Metric (G body) frame mounts which are 6-7/8" center-to-center
$69.99
/each
In Stock
Quantity
Need Help? Call to Order
Add to a list
Select a vehicle to verify Fitment
Select Vehicle
Product Summary
- Tubular steel construction with aluminum cross shaft for maximum weight reduction
- 1" OD .092" wall thickness tubing reduces weight while maintaining durability
- Bolts to stock 1978-87 Metric (G body) frame mounts which are 6-7/8" center-to-center
- Accepts stock replacement Metric ball joints K5208 or equivalent
- Use with frame mount 91634312 when relocating stock frame brackets
Key Specs
| Control Arm Style | Tubular |
| Position | Select Side |
| Ball Joint Type | Bolt-in |
| Bushing Material | Steel |
| Control Arm Material | Steel |
Need To Know
Need help?
855.313.9176Quick and Easy Returns
Return PolicyDetails
Details
- Tubular steel construction with aluminum cross shaft for less weight
- Approximately two pounds lighter per arm than steel cross shaft design
- Fits 78-87 GM Metric chassis configurations for racing use
- IMCA approved and includes approval decals
- Left side control arm maintains stock GM spec 8.5-inch length
- Right side is 8.0-inch length to provide additional negative camber
- Reinforced ball joint mount is designed for K5208-spec metric chassis ball joints
- Sold individually and does not include ball joint or mounting hardware
IMCA Approved Metric Chassis Control Arms with Aluminum Cross Shaft
The factory stamped style front Metric upper control arms do not provide the strength and reinforcement necessary to survive the circle track racing lap after lap. Flexing and cracking are the norm with stock stamped steel Metric upper control arms, which can lead to catastrophic control arm failure and a bad wreck. No one wants that. A much safer and stronger alternative is a steel tubular control arm. The increased strength and rigidity of this style of front upper control arms mean repeatable handling with minimal wear and maintenance. IMCA understands this and is why they allow a tubular control arm as the spec piece in classes such as Stock Car. Now you can replace your aging or worn stamped steel control arms with these stronger IMCA upper control arms for your Metric chassis-based race car.
Made from 1-inch diameter .092-inch wall thickness steel tubing and featuring a reinforced 1/4-inch-thick ball joint mounting plate, these IMCA approved tubular steel front upper control arms include lightweight aluminum cross shafts. These aluminum cross shafts are a metal-on-metal greaseable pivot design and save two pounds of front-end weight per tubular control arm over our standard tubular control arm with steel cross shaft. The cross shaft is designed to mount to GM Metric chassis fitments with 6-7/8-inch mount spacing (or use our weld-on mount plate). We made the left arm standard 8.50-inch in length to maintain the factory suspension geometry, while we shortened the right arm to 8.0 inches to increase negative camber for circle track use. These are often used in conjunction with “tall” ball joints, and these arms use standard Metric arm K5208 ball joints. A steel cross shaft version is also available for those looking for absolute durability and longer service life.
Specifications
Specifications
| KEY SPECS | |
|---|---|
| MFG. Part # | Select Side to see |
| Brand | Speedway Motors |
| Control Arm Style | Tubular |
| Position | Select Side to see |
| Ball Joint Type | Bolt-in |
| Bushing Material | Steel |
| Control Arm Material | Steel |
| Hardware Included | No |
| Adjustable | No |
| Finish | Painted |
| GENERAL | |
| Mount Center to Ball Joint Center | Select Side to see |
| Mounting Bolt Center to Center | 6.88" |
| Material Type | Steel |
| Cross Pin Material | Aluminum |
| Ball Joint Included | No |
| Sold in Quantity | Each |
| Tube O.D. | 1" |
| Shaft Diameter | 0.73" |
| Material Thickness | .092" |
| Notes | Fits 1978-87 mid-size GM Metric chassis. Bolts to stock mount and accepts stock ball joints. |
Ratings & Reviews
4.9
12 Reviews
The product, a lightweight control arm, is widely commended for its quality and affordability. Customers appreciate its good craftsmanship and excellent fit, attributing this to high calibre welding and painting. Users particularly note its superior camber compared to stock items and its multi-sided usability feature. Its adaptability for varied uses, including air ride setups for G-Body and S-10 models, is well-regarded. The product is credited for its durability and enhanced suspension capabilities contributing to a high level of customer satisfaction and their willingness for future purchases.
Ratings & Reviews
4.9
12 Reviews
The product, a lightweight control arm, is widely commended for its quality and affordability. Customers appreciate its good craftsmanship and excellent fit, attributing this to high calibre welding and painting. Users particularly note its superior camber compared to stock items and its multi-sided usability feature. Its adaptability for varied uses, including air ride setups for G-Body and S-10 models, is well-regarded. The product is credited for its durability and enhanced suspension capabilities contributing to a high level of customer satisfaction and their willingness for future purchases.
4.9
12 reviews
5
11
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Filter by Ratings
Lightweight control arms
5.0
2 years ago
623Rob
Surprise Az
Verified
I used a pair of the right side arms on the front of a s10 paired up with 1" extended ball joints. Arms are lightweight with good craftsmanship.
Would Recommend
Would purchase again.
5.0
6 years ago
Spike89
ND
Verified
Using on S10, looks like they will work fine.
Would Recommend
Very light
4.0
7 years ago
S10 Addiction
Gladewater , Texas
Verified
Nice part and a nice price
Would Recommend
I would buy this product again
5.0
7 years ago
Trevor Thomas
Booneville Arkansas
Verified
Well fitting product
Would Recommend
Metric tubular A-arms used on S10
5.0
8 years ago
Guru
Illinois
Verified
Very good quality of welds and paint finish also seem to be put together well. No disappointments and would buy again.
Would Recommend
Great price, great quality
5.0
8 years ago
Eighties guy
Ontario, Canada
Verified
These arms are light, well built, and provide a much better camber than stock. They are completely flat, so you can flip them over to use on the left side as well.
Would Recommend
I would buy again
5.0
9 years ago
Slapee
Liberty center oh
Verified
Going on s10, very lite weight
Would Recommend
I will be buy more for the raceseason
5.0
9 years ago
Bo
Waukegan il
Verified
Easy install increased suspension capabilities
Would Recommend
GREAT PRODUCT WOULD RECOMND
5.0
10 years ago
HROD322
MUSKOGEE
Verified
GREAT
Would Recommend
Best deal anywhere
5.0
10 years ago
Thomas
Baton Rouge, LA
Verified
The control arms were a perfect fit. All machining and welds are excellent quality. Wall thickness is very good unlike most cheaper arms I've installed. These are not only some of the best quality control arms I've used, but also by far the most affordable.
Would Recommend
Showing 10 of 12 reviews
Questions & Answers
13 Questions • 10 Answers
Questions & Answers
13 Questions • 10 Answers
What is the weight difference between this upper control arm and the upper control arm with the steel cross?
by Levi 8
• 7 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
I have read these arms are intended for dirt G-body cars, but will fit an s10. Would running two rights (8" long) give me more negative camber on both sides compared to stock geometry?
by drew
• 9 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Has any of the geometry affecting caster and camber been changed from stock on this product? I have added taller upper ball joints to my car (for autocross and street use) and am now having to run an excessive amount of shims with my stock A arms. Will these reduce the number of camber shims needed?
by Cone Dodger
• 10 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Will these work on my 1988 s10
by Jose
• 10 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Difference between this and Item # 91031133 This other listing for chromoly UCA seems to be the same arm, what is different?
by JerryG419
• 12 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Which ball joint? Which size ball joint is proper for this arm? Truck style (big), or standard?
by Vendetta3113
• 12 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Are these suitable for the street, meaning do the have any bushings or are they metal on metal?
by nufan
• 13 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
will this fit a 1970 chevy nova
by bull
• 13 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Will these work on a 2001 s10 with tall upper ball joints? Are these suitable for the street?
by
• 15 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
How often do you need to regrease these non bushing style control arms? like every 'X' miles?
by rye
• 15 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
10 of 13 questions shown

