|
#91034394
IMCA Spec GM Metric Stock Car Racing Upper Control Arms, Steel Cross
- Tubular steel construction with steel cross shaft for durability
- 1" OD .092" wall thickness tubing reduces weight while maintaining durability
- Bolts to stock 1978-87 Metric (G body) frame mounts which are 6-7/8" center-to-center
$69.99
/each
In Stock
Quantity
Need Help? Call to Order
Add to a list
Select a vehicle to verify Fitment
Select Vehicle
Product Summary
6.88" Mounting Bolt Center to Center, Steel, Painted
- Tubular steel construction with steel cross shaft for durability
- 1" OD .092" wall thickness tubing reduces weight while maintaining durability
- Bolts to stock 1978-87 Metric (G body) frame mounts which are 6-7/8" center-to-center
- Accepts stock replacement Metric ball joints K5208 or equivalent
- Use with frame mount 91634312 when relocating stock frame brackets
Key Specs
| Control Arm Style | Tubular |
| Position | Select Side |
| Ball Joint Type | Bolt-in |
| Bushing Material | Steel |
| Control Arm Material | Steel |
Need To Know
Need help?
855.313.9176Quick and Easy Returns
Return PolicyDetails
Details
IMCA rules allow the Stock Car class to use spec tubular upper control arms. The stock stamped steel arms are getting hard to find and don't have the strength of these tubular arms. These A-arms bolt to your stock mounts and accept stock ball joints. These control arms have a 1/4" thick steel plate where the ball joint bolts in. Fits 1978-87 mid-size GM Metric chassis.
- Steel construction
- 1" tube diameter, 0.092 wall
- Steel cross shaft
- Bolts to stock 1978-87 Metric mounts (6-7/8" center-to-center)
- Greaseable steel bushings
- Accepts stock K5208 style Metric ball joints
- IMCA Approved stickers
- Available for right (passenger side) or left (drivers side)
- Right arm length is 8"
- Left arm length is 8.5"
Use with mount plate 916-34312.
Specifications
Specifications
| KEY SPECS | |
|---|---|
| MFG. Part # | Select Side to see |
| Brand | Speedway Motors |
| Control Arm Style | Tubular |
| Position | Select Side to see |
| Ball Joint Type | Bolt-in |
| Bushing Material | Steel |
| Control Arm Material | Steel |
| Hardware Included | No |
| Adjustable | No |
| Finish | Painted |
| GENERAL | |
| Mounting Bolt Center to Center | 6.88" |
| Material Type | Steel |
| Overall Width | 12.25" |
| Ball Joint Included | No |
| Color | Black |
| Sold in Quantity | Each |
| Shaft Diameter | 1.25" |
| Material Thickness | .092" |
| Notes | Select Side to see |
Ratings & Reviews
4.6
33 Reviews
Customers highly recommend the product, praising its quality, durability, and excellent fit for various vehicles. Users appreciate the heavy-duty construction, which ensures longevity, and its usability in different car models. Its practicality is highlighted by its easy installation and adjustable settings. Further, the product stands out due to its smooth operation and reduced friction. Consumers have repeatedly selected this product over competitors' offerings, valuing its ability to withstand high temperatures, making it perfect for high-performance vehicles. Its versatility even extends to racing, where it is praised for its strength and weight-saving design. Despite isolated issues with loose pivots in few units, the overall customer satisfaction is high.
Ratings & Reviews
4.6
33 Reviews
Customers highly recommend the product, praising its quality, durability, and excellent fit for various vehicles. Users appreciate the heavy-duty construction, which ensures longevity, and its usability in different car models. Its practicality is highlighted by its easy installation and adjustable settings. Further, the product stands out due to its smooth operation and reduced friction. Consumers have repeatedly selected this product over competitors' offerings, valuing its ability to withstand high temperatures, making it perfect for high-performance vehicles. Its versatility even extends to racing, where it is praised for its strength and weight-saving design. Despite isolated issues with loose pivots in few units, the overall customer satisfaction is high.
4.6
33 reviews
5
24
4
8
3
0
2
0
1
1
Most Liked Positive Review
4.0
Great Product for Vehicles with Headers
I have to use a metal bearing upper control arm because my headers will melt polyurethane. I had ordered a pair of these originally from a guy on ebay for a ridiculous price. What he doesn't tell you is what length he will sell you. (They are the 8.0" version) For a 3" (2" Spindle, 1" spring) lowered street driven 2003 S10 2X4: If you use the 8.5" version (Left upper control arm) for both sides, you will have to use a lot of shims. Took a guy 2.5hrs to shim mine. If you use the 8.0" version (Right upper control arm) for both sides, you will be limited on how well they can put a true alignment on the truck due to the limited space. (No such thing as anti-shims :-) ) Love the fact that these are metal bearing. However, standard road driving will eventually tear these apart. My original set lasted about 2.5yrs (50k miles). Note: Remove the zerk fittings and put on 1/4" 90 degree zerk fittings. This will allow you to grease easily. I do recommend these. Enjoy!
Most Liked Negative Review
1.0
Poor quality
I have received 2 of these arms so far and they both had loose pivots right out of the box. I'm currently awaiting a 3rd on in the hopes that it is tight enough to use.
Filter by Ratings
I would buy this again
5.0
8 months ago
Ed
Salina,ks
Verified
For racing
Would Recommend
I would buy this again
5.0
8 months ago
Ed
Salina,ks
Verified
For racing
Would Recommend
It works perfectly
5.0
2 years ago
Hot rod
Tampa
Verified
Fit well
Would Recommend
Poor quality
1.0
4 years ago
5spd SUV
SE Michigan
Verified
I have received 2 of these arms so far and they both had loose pivots right out of the box. I'm currently awaiting a 3rd on in the hopes that it is tight enough to use.
Would Not Recommend
I would buy this again
5.0
4 years ago
Bryan
Texas
Verified
Excellent Fit solid construction
Would Recommend
Great value of a product fit an s10 chassis fine
5.0
6 years ago
Chris
Hartwell ga
Verified
Used two for both sides on a s10 frame swap
Would Recommend
Yes I would buy again
5.0
7 years ago
Joe Vlasity
Glendale Az.
Verified
Great quality part!
Would Recommend
I would buy this again
5.0
8 years ago
Tanner
Natoma ks
Verified
Imca stockcar
Would Recommend
S10 tubular metric a arm
5.0
8 years ago
Hambone
Illinois
Verified
Great looking tubular a arm. heavy-duty cross shaft
Would Recommend
I would buy this again
4.0
8 years ago
Travis
Milford
Verified
Product worked great
Would Recommend
Showing 10 of 33 reviews
Questions & Answers
Questions & Answers
9 Questions • 11 Answers
Will this fit a '79 Camaro?
by Burns
• 9 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
I have a 78 El Camino that I drag race occasionally. It is mostly used for street duty, approximately 3 to 4 thousand miles a year. Should I get the 8 inch or the 8.5 inch uppers for my car?
by midoh
• 9 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
I have used these on many s10 truck builds. Would these work on a 1993 c1500 Chevy 2wd truck . Thanks.
by Patrick
• 10 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Ball joint hole size How big is the hole for the ball joint? My ball joint measures 1.83.
by Tom44
• 11 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Ball joint size Will these work with 20032-1 ball joints? They require a larger mounting hole.
by Tom44
• 11 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
will this fit a 64 chevelle im putting together a street stock for asphalt oval track racing
by imJerry
• 12 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Will these fit a 1964 Chevy Impala Non SS Will these fit a 1964 Chevy Impala Non SS
by AlexG
• 12 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Would these work on an 1986 GN as bolt-ons? For drag racing and road racing?
by Turbopowered68
• 13 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Can these be used on a stock S10 chassis with a sbc on the street? If so would you need both the same lenghth? If so which length?
by wibas
• 15 years ago
3 answers
View Answers
9 of 9 questions shown

