|
#9171266
$233.99
/pair
In Stock
Quantity
Need Help? Call to Order
Add to a list
Select a vehicle to verify Fitment
Select Vehicle
55-57 Chevy, 67-69 Chevy, 67-69 Pontiac, Steel, Painted
| MFG. Part # | MC1266 |
| Spring Rate | 327 lbs. |
| Free Height | 16.5" |
| Material Type | Steel |
| Finish | Painted |
Need help?
855.313.9176Quick and Easy Returns
Return PolicyIf your front end is sagging, you need a set of these new coil springs. Springs are 16.5 inches in length.
Sold in pairs.
| KEY SPECS | |
|---|---|
| MFG. Part # | MC1266 |
| Brand | Eaton Detroit Spring |
| Spring Rate | 327 lbs. |
| Free Height | 16.5" |
| Material Type | Steel |
| Finish | Painted |
| Color | Black |
| Spring Rate Range | 300 - 399 lbs. |
| GENERAL | |
| Sold in Quantity | Pair |
| Progressive Rate Spring | No |
| Coil Spring End (A) | Square |
| Coil Spring End (B) | Pigtail |
4.9
8 Reviews
Customers express high satisfaction with our product - the Eaton Springs' performance, lauding it a reliable and efficient replacement for stock springs. Notably, it's praised for its perfect fit in cars like the '67 and '69 Camaro models. Eaton Springs are applauded for their practical, easy installation process due to no need for a spring compressor. These springs provide a great ride height, provisioning an optimal balance, boosting front-end lift and drive experience. The robust material offers structural integrity and resilience, minimizing wear down and ensuring an extended lifespan for the springs. Overall, our product is favored over competitors for its quality, efficacy, and durability.
4.9
8 reviews
5
7
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Filter by Ratings
Yes good buy
5.0
5 years ago
68 Camaro
Iowa
Verified
Out with old in with new 45 min job!!
Would Recommend
Stock springs with nice ride height.
5.0
5 years ago
Mike89co
Arvada, Colorado
Verified
I put the Speedway Arms on my 69 Camaro with these stock height springs. No spring compressor needed. The Ridetech springs were very nice, but the front sat Too low for me. So, I put these Eaton springs in, and it picked the front up perfect.
Would Recommend
Second time I bought this product
5.0
6 years ago
Craig
Saint Paul Minnesota
Verified
Springs fit good in the 67 Camaro project
Would Recommend
Great stock replacement
5.0
8 years ago
Jose
Fair Oaks Ranch, Tx
Verified
Used these to replace the stock springs on my 69 sbc camaro. Great fit and ride.
Would Recommend
Would buy again
5.0
8 years ago
Rob
Lima ohio
Verified
As described. Good product
Would Recommend
Fast Shipping
5.0
10 years ago
BroncoJon
Denver
Verified
Standard coil spring install. Ends of springs cannot be rotated to match reliefs in top and bottom at the same time. Must be trimmed which lowers the car and changes the spring rate.
Would Recommend
They are definitely Springs
5.0
10 years ago
Don the Engineer
Lawrence, KS
Verified
These went in my '69 camaro ss. Springs are not fun to clean up. Tight places, and can't use electrolysis since it can cause hydrogen embrittlement (bad for structural members which need a predictable load deflection response---like springs). Replace them with a good set like these.
Would Recommend
Springs fit perfectly
4.0
11 years ago
Art
So. TX
Verified
the springs went in like a glove. no problems. shouldn't have to do it again anytime soon, but if I did, no problem.
Would Recommend
Showing 8 of 8 reviews
1 Question • 1 Answer
what is the outside diameter?
by webnik
• 12 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
1 of 1 questions shown
1955-1957 Chevy Bel Air
1967-1969 Chevy Camaro
1957 Chevy Del Ray
1955-1957 Chevy Nomad
1955-1957 Chevy One-Fifty Series
1955-1957 Chevy Sedan Delivery
1955-1957 Chevy Two-Ten Series
1967-1969 Pontiac Firebird
