|
#91034397
1970-81 Camaro Upper Racing Control A-Arm
- This upper control arm for 1970-1981 Camaro bolts directly to the stock frame mount which is 7-3/4" center to center bolt spacing
- Requires a K6024 or K6136 style ball joint which are larger and heavier duty than the stock Camaro ball joint
- Larger ball joint requires reaming the Camaro spindles but will increase strength and have less problems bending ball joints
Starting from
$63.99
/each
In Stock
Quantity
Need Help? Call to Order
Add to a list
Select a vehicle to verify Fitment
Select Vehicle
Product Summary
- This upper control arm for 1970-1981 Camaro bolts directly to the stock frame mount which is 7-3/4" center to center bolt spacing
- Requires a K6024 or K6136 style ball joint which are larger and heavier duty than the stock Camaro ball joint
- Larger ball joint requires reaming the Camaro spindles but will increase strength and have less problems bending ball joints
- Stock Camaro length is 9 1/4" but these are offered in a variety of other lengths to suit your needs
- Available in 8", 8-1/4", 8-1/2", 8-3/4", 9", 9-1/4" and 9-1/2" length which is measured center of ball joint to center of cross shaft
Key Specs
| Control Arm Style | Tubular |
| Position | Front Upper |
| Ball Joint Type | Select Length |
| Bushing Material | Steel |
| Control Arm Material | Steel |
Need To Know
Need help?
855.313.9176Quick and Easy Returns
Return PolicyDetails
Details
Cross shaft mount bolts center on center. Measures 7-3/4". The arms are symmetrical.
Note: This control arm does not use a stock Camaro ball joint, (all) of the ball joints that we offer require reaming stock spindle.
Note: Our "length" reference refers to the distance from the center of the ball joint to the centerline of the cross shaft. The "stock" length of a Camaro upper A-arm is 9-1/4".
Specifications
Specifications
| KEY SPECS | |
|---|---|
| MFG. Part # | Select Length to see |
| Brand | Speedway Motors |
| Control Arm Style | Tubular |
| Position | Front Upper |
| Ball Joint Type | Select Length to see |
| Bushing Material | Steel |
| Control Arm Material | Steel |
| Hardware Included | No |
| Adjustable | No |
| Finish | Painted |
| GENERAL | |
| Mount Center to Ball Joint Center | Select Length to see |
| Mounting Bolt Center to Center | 7.75" |
| Material Type | Steel |
| Ball Joint Included | No |
| Color | Black |
| Sold in Quantity | Each |
| Notes | requires the use of a K6024-style ball joint |
Ratings & Reviews
4.7
50 Reviews
Customers find this product to be of excellent quality and sturdy in design, making it ideal for fitting older car models such as 1970 Firebird or Chevy Caprice. Its robust build and adjustable features allow this product to withstand years of use in racing conditions, maintaining stability and reliable control. Customers appreciate the product's affordability and how lightweight it is compared to stock parts, an aspect which makes performance more efficient. Some customers recommend that newcomers have a basic understanding of installations given some minor fitting modifications might be required. The product also wins over users with its ability in providing tunable camber, which is a practical feature for racing enthusiasts. Totaling all positivity, customers have shown satisfaction with the durability, practicality, and the tuning capabilities of the product. However, a few users wish for stronger versions for heavier racing conditions.
Ratings & Reviews
4.7
50 Reviews
Customers find this product to be of excellent quality and sturdy in design, making it ideal for fitting older car models such as 1970 Firebird or Chevy Caprice. Its robust build and adjustable features allow this product to withstand years of use in racing conditions, maintaining stability and reliable control. Customers appreciate the product's affordability and how lightweight it is compared to stock parts, an aspect which makes performance more efficient. Some customers recommend that newcomers have a basic understanding of installations given some minor fitting modifications might be required. The product also wins over users with its ability in providing tunable camber, which is a practical feature for racing enthusiasts. Totaling all positivity, customers have shown satisfaction with the durability, practicality, and the tuning capabilities of the product. However, a few users wish for stronger versions for heavier racing conditions.
4.7
50 reviews
5
38
4
9
3
2
2
1
1
0
Most Liked Positive Review
5.0
Awesome Control Arm Saves A Lot Of Weight
Let's face it, the lighter the car, the faster it goes. The 910-34397 Tubular Upper Control Arm is a huge Bang For The Buck, the price is great, and they will save you 4 Pounds per side over Stock Upper Control Arms. They are available in 7 different lengths, for Various Front Suspension needs. They are for Race Applications, and do use a Heavy Duty, Larger Ball Joint, so if you're using Factory Stock Spindles, you will need to have them reamed to the proper taper.
Most Liked Negative Review
3.0
Could be stronger
These are nice for tuning in camber, eliminated all my shims. I just wish they were built heavier for street stock racing. I've bent a few up with only light contact with other cars that the stock one never would have bent.
Filter by Ratings
Great product
5.0
6 months ago
Mr 90 Fabrication
Florence AL
Verified
Fits perfectly. Will buy again after my driver "modifies" this one.
Would Recommend
Excellent item
5.0
9 months ago
Jaynird
Central Valley ca
Verified
Excellent fit and finish great product
Would Recommend
Quality products
5.0
a year ago
Q
Louisiana
Verified
Heavy duty and quality products.
Would Recommend
I would definitely buy again
5.0
a year ago
Jon
Winnipeg
Verified
It's now part of the suspension in my dirt track race car
Would Recommend
Yes
5.0
a year ago
Wi96
Wisconsin
Verified
Worked and fit as it should.
Would Recommend
I would buy it again
5.0
a year ago
Chubs
West Virginia
Verified
I use it on my dirt track car
Would Recommend
I would buy this again
5.0
2 years ago
Tom
Maryland
Verified
Sturdy and durable
Would Recommend
I would buy this again
5.0
2 years ago
Td
Maryland
Verified
Fit perfect on my Racecar 78 Camaro front end. Will buy again
Would Recommend
Buying a Second Set
5.0
3 years ago
Scooba Steeve
Casper Wyoming
Used these on my 1970 Firebird. Lasted 6 years of road trips, autocrosses, track days, and drifting. Just started to get a little loose. Awesome control arms.
Would Recommend
works for caprice chassis
4.0
3 years ago
speedracer 29
indianapolis, in
Verified
fits caprice/ impalla chassis (77-90)
Would Recommend
Showing 10 of 50 reviews
Questions & Answers
27 Questions • 12 Answers
Questions & Answers
27 Questions • 12 Answers
Will they fit a 75 Nova
by Sammie
• 6 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
will these arms fit the 73-77 chevelle chassis?
by Clay
• 7 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
will these work for street use I have a 80 z-28 and needed upper control arm for street use thanks
by time
• 7 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
I just purchased these and when I installed them my camber was way off. compared to my original a arms there is a 1/2 to 3/4 difference. I have pictures to show what im talking about. I ordered 910-34397-9.25 because that is what one of your tech and website said was O.E. length. I hope i get answer after just setting on hot for 30min with no reply.
by erik
• 8 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
As Described.. This Arm Requires The K6024 Ball Joint. Is There Any Ball Joints That Fit Theses Arms That Have A Longer Shaft ?
by Lowroder
• 8 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Being These Arms Are Symmetrical... Do They Fit Either Driver Or Passenger Sides?
by Lowroder
• 8 years ago
3 answers
View Answers
Do you offer a tubular lower control arm to work with the this upper for a 74 firebird??? Thanks
by Jerry
• 8 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Does the narrowed arm move the upper ball joint fore/aft from its stock location (affecting caster) or purely inward (affecting only camber)? Do you offer a narrowed tie rod end? What part number should be used with the narrowed a-arms?
by Todd
• 9 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Hello. Does anyone know if these will fit a full size impala. 1996
by Bradley
• 9 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
Do you have a upper that is more suited for the street in a 1973 camaro app
by Tim
• 9 years ago
1 answer
View Answer
10 of 27 questions shown

