Product Summary

  • This upper control arm for 1970-1981 Camaro bolts directly to the stock frame mount which is 7-3/4" center to center bolt spacing
  • Requires a K6024 or K6136 style ball joint which are larger and heavier duty than the stock Camaro ball joint
  • Larger ball joint requires reaming the Camaro spindles but will increase strength and have less problems bending ball joints
  • Stock Camaro length is 9 1/4" but these are offered in a variety of other lengths to suit your needs
  • Available in 8", 8-1/4", 8-1/2", 8-3/4", 9", 9-1/4" and 9-1/2" length which is measured center of ball joint to center of cross shaft
See more details

Key Specs

Control Arm StyleTubular
PositionFront Upper
Ball Joint Type
Bushing MaterialSteel
Control Arm MaterialSteel
See more specs

Need To Know

Quick and Easy Returns

Return Policy

Details

This upper control arm for 1970-1981 Camaro is designed to be used with the stock mount. Available in 8", 8-1/4", 8-1/2", 8-3/4", 9", 9-1/4", 9-1/2". This control arm requires the use of a K6024-style ball joint, which is equivalent a 1963-’71 Chevy pickup style upper ball joint. It will have a 7 degree tapered stud and therefore, the stock Camaro spindle must be reamed to fit the pickup ball joint.

Cross shaft mount bolts center on center. Measures 7-3/4". The arms are symmetrical.

Note: This control arm does not use a stock Camaro ball joint, (all) of the ball joints that we offer require reaming stock spindle.

Note: Our "length" reference refers to the distance from the center of the ball joint to the centerline of the cross shaft. The "stock" length of a Camaro upper A-arm is 9-1/4".

 

Specifications

KEY SPECS
MFG. Part #
BrandSpeedway Motors
Control Arm StyleTubular
PositionFront Upper
Ball Joint Type
Bushing MaterialSteel
Control Arm MaterialSteel
Hardware IncludedNo
AdjustableNo
FinishPainted
GENERAL
Mount Center to Ball Joint Center
Mounting Bolt Center to Center7.75"
Material TypeSteel
Ball Joint IncludedNo
ColorBlack
Sold in QuantityEach
Notesrequires the use of a K6024-style ball joint

Ratings & Reviews

4.7

50 Reviews

Overall Assessment

Customers find this product to be of excellent quality and sturdy in design, making it ideal for fitting older car models such as 1970 Firebird or Chevy Caprice. Its robust build and adjustable features allow this product to withstand years of use in racing conditions, maintaining stability and reliable control. Customers appreciate the product's affordability and how lightweight it is compared to stock parts, an aspect which makes performance more efficient. Some customers recommend that newcomers have a basic understanding of installations given some minor fitting modifications might be required. The product also wins over users with its ability in providing tunable camber, which is a practical feature for racing enthusiasts. Totaling all positivity, customers have shown satisfaction with the durability, practicality, and the tuning capabilities of the product. However, a few users wish for stronger versions for heavier racing conditions.

4.7

50 reviews

5

38

4

9

3

2

2

1

1

0

Most Liked Positive Review

5.0

Awesome Control Arm Saves A Lot Of Weight

Let's face it, the lighter the car, the faster it goes. The 910-34397 Tubular Upper Control Arm is a huge Bang For The Buck, the price is great, and they will save you 4 Pounds per side over Stock Upper Control Arms. They are available in 7 different lengths, for Various Front Suspension needs. They are for Race Applications, and do use a Heavy Duty, Larger Ball Joint, so if you're using Factory Stock Spindles, you will need to have them reamed to the proper taper.

Most Liked Negative Review

3.0

Could be stronger

These are nice for tuning in camber, eliminated all my shims. I just wish they were built heavier for street stock racing. I've bent a few up with only light contact with other cars that the stock one never would have bent.

Filter by Ratings

Great product

5.0

6 months ago

Mr 90 Fabrication

Florence AL

Verified

Fits perfectly. Will buy again after my driver "modifies" this one.

Would Recommend

Excellent item

5.0

9 months ago

Jaynird

Central Valley ca

Verified

Excellent fit and finish great product

Would Recommend

Quality products

5.0

a year ago

Q

Louisiana

Verified

Heavy duty and quality products.

Would Recommend

I would definitely buy again

5.0

a year ago

Jon

Winnipeg

Verified

It's now part of the suspension in my dirt track race car

Would Recommend

Yes

5.0

a year ago

Wi96

Wisconsin

Verified

Worked and fit as it should.

Would Recommend

I would buy it again

5.0

a year ago

Chubs

West Virginia

Verified

I use it on my dirt track car

Would Recommend

I would buy this again

5.0

2 years ago

Tom

Maryland

Verified

Sturdy and durable

Would Recommend

I would buy this again

5.0

2 years ago

Td

Maryland

Verified

Fit perfect on my Racecar 78 Camaro front end. Will buy again

Would Recommend

Buying a Second Set

5.0

3 years ago

Scooba Steeve

Casper Wyoming

Used these on my 1970 Firebird. Lasted 6 years of road trips, autocrosses, track days, and drifting. Just started to get a little loose. Awesome control arms.

Would Recommend

works for caprice chassis

4.0

3 years ago

speedracer 29

indianapolis, in

Verified

fits caprice/ impalla chassis (77-90)

Would Recommend

Load More Reviews

Showing 10 of 50 reviews

Questions & Answers

27 Questions • 12 Answers

Will they fit a 75 Nova

by Sammie

• 6 years ago

1 answer

will these arms fit the 73-77 chevelle chassis?

by Clay

• 7 years ago

1 answer

will these work for street use I have a 80 z-28 and needed upper control arm for street use thanks

by time

• 7 years ago

1 answer

I just purchased these and when I installed them my camber was way off. compared to my original a arms there is a 1/2 to 3/4 difference. I have pictures to show what im talking about. I ordered 910-34397-9.25 because that is what one of your tech and website said was O.E. length. I hope i get answer after just setting on hot for 30min with no reply.

by erik

• 8 years ago

1 answer

As Described.. This Arm Requires The K6024 Ball Joint. Is There Any Ball Joints That Fit Theses Arms That Have A Longer Shaft ?

by Lowroder

• 8 years ago

1 answer

Being These Arms Are Symmetrical... Do They Fit Either Driver Or Passenger Sides?

by Lowroder

• 8 years ago

3 answers

Do you offer a tubular lower control arm to work with the this upper for a 74 firebird??? Thanks

by Jerry

• 8 years ago

1 answer

Does the narrowed arm move the upper ball joint fore/aft from its stock location (affecting caster) or purely inward (affecting only camber)? Do you offer a narrowed tie rod end? What part number should be used with the narrowed a-arms?

by Todd

• 9 years ago

1 answer

Hello. Does anyone know if these will fit a full size impala. 1996

by Bradley

• 9 years ago

1 answer

Do you have a upper that is more suited for the street in a 1973 camaro app

by Tim

• 9 years ago

1 answer

Load More Questions

10 of 27 questions shown

Customer Impersonation Script